Tpm_dev
Since shaz won’t post on the blog himself, I’ll post it here for him. This comes from his mail to SERG Archive:
This one is specially for Dr.M and Mr.T. The tpm_dev is a kernel module for backward compatibility, when application space made a call to tpm driver i.e. before TIS and 1.2 specification. Do you agree recluze? Now this kernel module is not required when a user space library, “tddl”, can forward userspace requests to “tpmd” the tpm daemon. Do we really need to port tpm_dev module to kernel. It will not be tough but the lesser we handle at a time the better possibility to troubleshoot.
Waiting for ur suggestions. I know its not very difficult to decide but wanted a group decision so that we are even.
3 Comments to Tpm_dev
Leave a comment
Search
Recent Comments
- Khushal Khan on Dynamic Behavioral Attestation for Mobile Platforms
- Dynamic Behavioral Attestation for Mobile Platforms - Project « recluze on DBAMP
- shazkhan on Backing up OpenMoko FR before bricking it and getting your custom kernel and rootfs onto it …
- shazkhan on Getting Java on Openmoko
- shazkhan on A Standardized .bib File
Archives
- November 2008 (6)
- October 2008 (4)
- September 2008 (2)
- August 2008 (4)
- July 2008 (1)
- June 2008 (5)
- January 2008 (5)
- December 2007 (5)
- November 2007 (5)
- October 2007 (3)
- September 2007 (6)
- August 2007 (14)
- July 2007 (25)
- June 2007 (24)
- May 2007 (33)
- April 2007 (70)
Categories
- Achievements (7)
- Announcements (16)
- Blogroll (1)
- Conferences (11)
- Formal Methods (8)
- Ideas (11)
- Isabelle (6)
- Linux (18)
- News (28)
- Publications (1)
- Resources (30)
- SELinux (10)
- Trusted Computing (11)
- Uncategorized (104)
I’m not sure what tpm_dev is. I never came across it during our implementation. If as you say, it’s something from before tpm_tis, we probably don’t need it. Tpm1.1 spec had many problems and has been _extensively_ revised in 1.2. So, I don’t think you should worry about it until the troubleshooting phase. Maybe Mr. T and DrM can shed more light.
I had the same opinion about it too. Now that I went through the readme of tpm emulator 0.5v, I came across this info that tpm_dev is totally obsolete now so now have to figure out how much obsolete
It was supported till 0.3v